SEO, Marketing, Advertising, Digital Marketing, Press release distribution

Federal prosecutors give National Enquirer publisher immunity 

0

Federal prosecutors have given immunity to the publisher of the National Enquirer in connection with the $150,000 hush-money payment the supermarket tabloid gave Karen McDougal, the Playboy model who claims she had an affair with President Donald Trump.

That payment to McDougal was made shortly before the 2016 presidential election, and was done “to influence” that election, which sent Trump to the White House, according to the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York.

The SDNY revealed its “non-prosecution agreement” with Enquirer publisher American Media Inc. on Wednesday, shortly after Trump’s former lawyer Michael Cohen was sentenced to three years in prison in U.S. District Court in Manhattan.

Cohen’s crimes included his playing a key role in getting AMI to pay off McDougal, and also had personally paid another purported paramour of Trump’s, porn star Stormy Daniels, right before the election to keep quiet about their alleged past trysts with Trump.

AMI admitted it paid off McDougal to keep her from publicizing her “damaging allegations” of having had a lengthy affair with Trump a decade before the 2016 election, the prosecutors’ office said.

The company also admitted “it made the $150,000 payment in concert with” Trump’s campaign, according to the SDNY.

“AMI further admitted that its principal purpose in making the payment was to suppress the woman’s story so as to prevent it from influencing the election,” prosecutors said.

Former federal prosecutor Mimi Rocah told MSNBC that AMI’s admission cripples Trump’s ability to claim that the payment to McDougal was not about the election, and thus not subject to federal campaign finance law rules.

In a similar case involving former Democratic presidential contender John Edwards, the only other time campaign finance charges were filed in a case involving payments to a mistress, the people who were payment Edwards’ love argued that the money was not intended to influence the election.

Prosecutors, Cohen and AMI now say the payments to McDougal were made to affect the election.

If AMI continues complying with the agreement, prosecutors will not bring charges against the company for the payment to McDougal.

The agreement acknowledged AMI’s “substantial and important assistance in this investigation, and its agreement to provide cooperation in the future,” prosecutors said.

The company also agreed to “to implement specific improvements to its internal compliance to prevent future violations of the federal campaign finance laws.”

Vanity Fair reported in August that David Pecker, a Trump pal who is chairman of AMI, had personally received an immunity agreement from prosecutors in connection with the McDougal payment, as had AMI’s chief content officer, Dylan Howard.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.